High-net-worth families in Australia commonly use family trusts and family investment companies (FICs) as vehicles for wealth management, asset protection, and succession planning. Each structure operates under distinct legal and tax frameworks. Choosing between them requires close attention to compliance obligations, tax outcomes, and governance priorities under Australian law.
A family trust, typically a discretionary trust, is a fiduciary relationship where a trustee legally holds property or investments for the benefit of beneficiaries, as set out in a trust deed.
Legal features include:
Risks: Undistributed income is taxed at 47%. Improper distributions may trigger the Family Trust Distribution Tax, and ATO scrutiny of trust arrangements has increased in recent years.
A Family Investment Company is a proprietary limited company incorporated under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), with family members typically holding shares and family-appointed directors managing operations.
Legal features include:
Risks: Companies face ongoing ASIC reporting requirements, governance obligations, and less favourable CGT treatment compared with trusts.
The structures differ fundamentally in law, taxation, and succession:
Deciding between a family trust and a family investment company requires more than just tax comparisons — it depends on long-term objectives, control preferences, and risk management priorities. The following breakdown outlines scenarios where each structure is most appropriate under Australian law, helping families choose a vehicle aligned with their financial strategy and estate planning needs.
A family trust is generally more suitable when:
A family investment company is more suitable when:
Yes. Many Australian families use a hybrid strategy:
Families must balance fiduciary obligations under trust law with directors’ duties under the Corporations Act. Tax compliance is equally critical: trusts risk penalty tax on incorrect distributions, while companies face stricter ASIC oversight. Legal advice is indispensable to ensure the chosen structure aligns with family objectives and statutory requirements. For many families, understanding how to find a good family lawyer is the first step in ensuring their wealth structures are drafted and managed in full compliance with Australian law.
Before addressing common queries, it is important to recognise that neither structure is inherently superior. The optimal choice depends on asset type, succession goals, and the family’s long-term tax strategy.
A trust is a fiduciary arrangement where a trustee holds assets for beneficiaries. A family investment company is a separate legal entity incorporated under the Corporations Act with directors and shareholders.
Trusts are generally preferred for property due to access to the 50% CGT discount and income streaming. Companies are more effective for long-term reinvestment where profits are retained rather than distributed.
Trusts distribute income to beneficiaries, taxed at their marginal rates. Companies pay corporate tax on retained earnings, with dividends carrying franking credits.
Trusts depend on deed provisions and trustee discretion, which can create uncertainty. Companies provide clearer succession pathways through share ownership and corporate governance structures.
Deciding between a family investment company and a trust requires close analysis of governance, taxation, and succession priorities under Australian law. Each has advantages and limitations. In many cases, using both structures in tandem offers the most effective solution.
Families considering trusts, companies, or hybrid structures should seek advice from a qualified estate planning lawyer via LegalFinda to secure the most appropriate legal framework for their wealth.